- Presentations - Degrees of economic integration research project
At-home
"The ultimate purpose of economics is to understand and promote the enhancement of well-being."
The first industrial revolution spanned from about 1760 to around 1840. Triggered by the construction of railroads and the invention of the steam engine, it ushered in mechanical production. The second industrial revolution, which started in the late 19th century and into the early 20th century, made mass production possible, fostered by the advent of electricity and the assembly line. The third industrial revolution began in the 1960s. It is usually called the computer or digital revolution because it was catalysed by the development of semiconductors, mainframe computing (1960s), personal computing (1970s and 80s) and the internet (1990s).
Mindful of the various definitions and academic arguments used to describe the first three industrial revolutions, I believe that today we are at the beginning of a fourth industrial revolution. It began at the turn of this century and builds on the digital revolution. It is characterized by a much more ubiquitous and mobile internet, by smaller and more powerful sensors that have become cheaper, and by artificial intelligence and machine learning.
Digital technologies that have computer hardware, software and networks at their core are not new, but in a break with the third industrial revolution, they are becoming more sophisticated and integrated and are, as a result, transforming societies and the global economy. This is the reason why Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Professors Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee have famously referred to this period as “the second machine age” 2, the title of their 2014 book, stating that the world is at an inflection point where the effect of these digital technologies will manifest with “full force” through automation and and the making of “unprecedented things”.
Schwab, Klaus. The Fourth Industrial Revolution (Kindle Locations 113-127). World Economic Forum. Kindle Edition.
Countless agencies, governments, and organizations have been dedicated to meeting even the most foundational schooling needs for children, and yet, as the United Nations Education, Scientific, and Culture Organization (UNESCO) reported in 2015, key global Education for All (EFA) goals that governments agreed to at the World Education Forum in Dakar in 2000 have not been attained, though some important headway has been made:
There has been tremendous progress across the world since 2000— but we are not there yet. Despite all efforts by governments, civil society and the international community, the world has not achieved Education for All.
On the positive side, the number of children and adolescents who were out of school has fallen by almost half since 2000. An estimated 34 million more children will have attended school as a result of faster progress since Dakar. The greatest progress has been achieved in gender parity, particularly in primary education, although gender disparity remains in almost a third of the countries with data. Governments have also increased efforts to measure learning outcomes through national and international assessments, using these to ensure that all children receive the quality of education they were promised.
And yet, for all this progress, 15 years of monitoring shows sobering results.
There are still 58 million children out of school globally and around 100 million children who do not complete primary education. Inequality in education has increased, with the poorest and most disadvantaged shouldering the heaviest burden. The world’s poorest children are four times more likely not to go to school than the world’s richest children, and five times more likely not to complete primary school. Conflict remains a steep barrier, with a high and growing proportion of out-of-school children living in conflict zones. Overall, the poor quality of learning at primary level still has millions of children leaving school without basic skills. (UNESCO 2015, p. i)
O'Brien, Catherine. Education for Sustainable Happiness and Well-Being (pp. 205-206). Taylor and Francis. Kindle Edition.
EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABILITY
Education for sustainability is more than just a new curriculum. It is about how the content and process of education can be interwoven with real-life contexts to create opportunities for young people to take the lead in building sustainable communities and societies. Peter Senge (2014, p. 325)
Peter Senge (2014) recounts the story of 12-year-old Analise during a student presentation evening. There were 250 people gathered to hear about the students’ sustainability projects. Analise represented her group and briefly described the wind turbine project that she and her peers had created at their middle school. Installing the wind turbine had involved many of the steps that Zhao (2012) outlined in product-oriented learning, including a presentation to the principal and the town’s mayor, as well as garnering expertise from parents to explore engineering and investment options. The scope of the project itself is impressive. Even more impressive is her wisdom and courage to challenge the adult audience. Senge tells us that once her presentation was finished,
Analise set aside her notes and standing calmly, some 75 pounds of fierce determination said, “We children are often hearing that ‘you children are the future.’ We don’t agree with that. We don’t have that much time. We need to make changes now. We kids are ready, are you?” (Senge, 2014, p. 328)
Analise is absolutely right. We need to make changes now. Muddling along with small revisions to curricula here and there is drastically out of step with the pressing need for educators to demonstrate greater leadership in sustainability education. (p. 85)